INTERNATIONAL HAIRDRESSING HISTORY PROJECT
Technical history · Chapter 03 of 06

Winding Techniques

How the geometry of winding changed permanent waving

Explore the six branches
01 · Origins & the Nessler System02 · Early Competing Systems03 · Winding Techniques04 · Machine Design & Salon Equipment05 · The Chemical Cold Wave06 · Modern Digital Perm

Research status: the distinction between documented patent claims, technical interpretation and unresolved questions is intentional. A named system is not automatically evidence of a unique invention.

Why winding mattered

Hair length, the diameter of the curl and the distance from the scalp affected the suitability of a procedure. Different winding patterns required compatible clamps, heaters and handling methods.

Croquignole: from ends to scalp

Croquignole winding wraps hair from the ends toward the scalp. The method is not automatically attributable to one inventor: priority, naming and commercial spread need separate evidence.

Josef Mayer and flat winding

Josef Mayer’s US Patent 1,619,794 (filed 19 March 1925, granted 1 March 1927) describes a heating appliance suited to flat-wound hair. Its lateral-opening heated shells address the practical problem of fitting a heater around the curler.

What was new?

The comparison should distinguish a winding method from the apparatus designed to work with it. A patented heater is not, by itself, proof that its inventor originated the entire winding technique.

Understanding the technique

Three questions behind every winding method

Where does winding begin?

Root-first and end-first winding produce different arrangements of the hair on the rod. The terms must be checked against contemporary training manuals.

What shape does the hair take?

A spiral distribution along a rod is not the same as layers of hair wrapped around one another. This affects the relationship between rod, hair and heater.

How is heat applied?

The heater must fit the resulting package of hair. Winding geometry and heating-appliance design therefore developed as connected technical problems.

Comparing the principles

ApproachTechnical arrangementHistorical question
Spiral windingHair is distributed helically along a rod; early permanent-wave practice used forms of spiral winding.Which specific rod, clamps and heaters were used in each documented system?
Croquignole windingHair is rolled from the ends towards the scalp, with successive layers accumulating around the rod.When did the term enter trade usage, and how did methods differ between salons?
Flat winding and associated heatersA flattened wound arrangement may require a heater capable of opening laterally around the hair package.What precisely is claimed in Josef Mayer’s patent, and what was already known?

These are comparative descriptions, not a claim that each method was invented by a single named person or appeared at one precise date.

Primary document · US 1,619,794

Josef Mayer: making the heater fit the winding

Mayer’s patent, filed on 19 March 1925 and issued on 1 March 1927, provides a concrete way to study the interaction between a winding arrangement and the appliance used to heat it. The patent drawings illustrate the construction described in the specification. Read the claims to determine the legally asserted invention; do not infer production numbers or salon adoption from the grant alone.

Original patent drawing of Josef Mayer’s permanent-wave heating appliance, US 1,619,794, 1927
Josef Mayer, US Patent 1,619,794 (1927). Original patent illustration. Consult the complete specification, drawings and claims ↗
What can we establish? The dated patent and its disclosed construction. What remains open? The precise priority of the underlying winding practice, evidence of manufacture, and its commercial use in individual salons.

Compare Mayer’s heater with Joyner’s supporting apparatus →

Why the distinction matters

A method of arranging hair, a tool for holding it and a patented heating appliance are three different kinds of historical evidence. Advertising may show a marketed product; a patent may describe a proposal; a photograph may document one installed machine. The most reliable reconstruction combines all three without treating them as interchangeable.

See our evidence register → · Return to the innovation atlas →

Research dossier · Evidence and open tasks

Original sources still needed

Documents and research leads